DUST Search - Posts by Phelix Mark

Result 1-7 of 7 for by author Phelix Mark (0,00 seconds)

Pages: [1]
1. [Request]WP for equipment destruction - in Feedback/Requests [original thread] Cross AtupÇì Providing both options allows for tactical flexibility as well as greater diversity in role specialization, providing more uses for hacking skills/mods. Allowing for both methods also puts heavy weight on tactical decision making re... - by Phelix Mark - at 2013.07.30 16:17:00
2. [Feedback/Suggestion]WP for scans - in Feedback/Requests [original thread] Phelix Mark wrote: low genius wrote: divide all your numbers by 5. ______________________________________ Very well... Ya know what, screw that! I'm sticking to the original Phelix Mark wrote: A) 5* WP for every enemy unit scanned p... - by Phelix Mark - at 2013.07.30 03:22:00
3. [Request]WP for equipment destruction - in Feedback/Requests [original thread] Nah. I think destroying them would prove more practical. It's like Meeko Fent said, Meeko Fent wrote: Go flux some uplinks. - by Phelix Mark - at 2013.07.29 22:56:00
4. [Request]WP for equipment destruction - in Feedback/Requests [original thread] Dirks Macker wrote: I would go with no more than 5 WP. Any higher and people would exploit. Exactly! That's why I suggested 2 per. Obviously there would most likely be an excessive amount of equipment when i a fire fight so anymore than 5 is... - by Phelix Mark - at 2013.07.29 22:34:00
5. [Feedback/Suggestion]WP for scans - in Feedback/Requests [original thread] low genius wrote: divide all your numbers by 5. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ Very well... I have suggested WP allocation if scans are rewarded. Possibilities for: scans ... - by Phelix Mark - at 2013.07.29 03:41:00
6. [Request]WP for equipment destruction - in Feedback/Requests [original thread] I would be great if we could receive a reward for destroying enemy equipment. Maybe 2 WP per? - by Phelix Mark - at 2013.07.29 03:38:00
7. [Feedback/Suggestion]WP for scans - in Feedback/Requests [original thread] I have suggested WP allocation if scans are rewarded. Possibilities for: scans A) 5* WP for every enemy unit scanned per use B) 15 WP for every enemy LAV scanned per use C) 20 WP for every enemy dropship scanned per use D) 20** WP for every ... - by Phelix Mark - at 2013.07.29 02:11:00
Pages: [1]
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

An Error Occured

Arguments are of the wrong type, are out of acceptable range, or are in conflict with one another.

The Error has been logged and will be further investigated shortly.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.